Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RE\s+\:\s+Deed\s+_protection_\s+for\s+antennas\s+using\s+CC\&R\'s\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "hermans" <on4kj@skynet.be>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:38:21 +0100
In other words " outplacement " Hey we heard about that elsewhere.....! Technically a very interesting matter, but dont you are affraid to lose great deal of your independence. Please leave the shot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00056.html (9,259 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:42:45 -0400
To me having the antenna and the station at the same place is all part of it otherwise I might as well just make a cell phone call. Just my take on it - too each their own though Mark N1UK G3ZZM -- O
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00058.html (10,717 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:24:31 -0700
Other radio services often have the station/studio and antenna in separate locations, for good reasons. EG, broadcasters, land mobile, marine shore stations. Time to catch up with the rest of the wor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00078.html (13,569 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:06:19 -0700
Unfortunately, I agree that remote stations are going to be increasingly necessary in the future. I also agree that a UHF radio link is the way to go if the remote station is close enough. On the oth
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00085.html (16,389 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 12:13:26 -0700
Kind of depends.. from a theoretical standpoint, one can get RF performance comparable to a tower and a beam with a variety of approaches that fit within a nominal 50x100x20 foot box that's visually
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00090.html (9,326 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "k6xyz" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:30:50 -0500
Well......maybe. It just depends on how far you are willing to move and how much you want to stay on HF. Regards Dave Harmon K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net Sperry, Ok. --Original Message-- From: towertal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00113.html (17,288 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:35:37 -0400
Even "remote" doesn't come with any gurantees. Purchase 20 acres, set up a remote with antenna farm, developer sells land around you, large group of fancy homes go up, form a HOA of which you aren't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00116.html (18,222 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:49:52 -0700
In the situation you describe, you can sell out to developers for a boatload of money and then go buy any QTH you want. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00121.html (21,149 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "k6xyz" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 01:14:40 -0500
Darn.....how did you guess that??? Regards Dave Harmon K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net Sperry, Ok. --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00122.html (22,183 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:28:04 -0400
And in that case I could probably be bought if the price is right<:-)) Roger (K8RI) In the situation you describe, you can sell out to developers for a boatload of money and then go buy any QTH you w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00136.html (21,816 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: "Donald Chester" <k4kyv@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 02:15:45 +0000
Even "remote" doesn't come with any gurantees. Purchase 20 acres, set up a remote with antenna farm, developer sells land around you, large group of fancy homes go up, form a HOA of which you aren't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00258.html (10,675 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's (score: 1)
Author: Alan NV8A <nv8a@att.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:26:38 -0400
I think that until not too long ago it was much the same in Taiwan, that bastion of aggressively anti-Communist "freedom", with which the USA has an unofficial but "special" relationship: neither has
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00271.html (8,558 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu