Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RF\s+Ground\s+is\s+not\s+a\s+Myth\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:29:35 -0700
Even though a perfect ground, RF or otherwise, does not exist in practice, the RF ground is not a myth. At least not a myth in the same sense that Thor, Zeus, just taxes, and Chupacabra are a myth. T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00388.html (7,947 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Mike Reublin NF4L <nf4l@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:28:59 -0500
I think the confusion exists because we insist on calling too many things "ground". To me, ground is earth. In electrical circuits (AC,DC,RF) there is return. I doubt the world is gonna adapt my view
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00394.html (9,285 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:21:35 -0800
This is why the electrical code (in the U.S.) is gradually moving away from the term "ground", "grounding", etc, to the term "bonding" and "bonding conductor", because it's the fact that it's a reli
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00396.html (7,874 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Swadener via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:41:06 +0000 (UTC)
Thor is the God of acheth and painth. ;-) vy 73,Bryan WA7PRC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contestin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00402.html (7,638 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:23:28 -0800
That is EXACTLY the problem, Mike. We try to solve hum, buzz, and RFI problems and make antennas work better by driving ground rods, when those ground rods don't help any of those things (except, of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00405.html (9,403 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:30:20 -0800
On Mon,1/19/2015 6:29 PM, James Duffey wrote: Simply put, an RF ground is an infinite source or sink of carriers, delivered or received with minimal delay. That of course is not realizable, but under
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00406.html (8,431 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:51:46 -0500
Believing in something does not make it so. Literally nothing is correct in that paragraph. -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice 727-214-2508 - Fax http://bryanfields.net ____________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00410.html (8,803 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:08:52 -0700
The misinformation contained in that post is breathtaking. The ARRL should dedicate a page on their website to that paragraph as a prime example of careless and unfounded conjecture in our hobby. It
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00411.html (10,497 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 22:19:04 -0800
Worthy of Professor Irwin Corey and Larson. E. Rapp Jim _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00412.html (8,793 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 01:53:07 -0500
I hope I get this correct: The word "Balun" is a contraction, or a concatenation of two abbreviations (Bal) for Balanced and (un) for unbalanced. In other words, Balanced to unbalanced. Jim's RF "cho
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00413.html (12,915 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Robert Morris <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:54:01 -0500
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac7G7xOG2Ag _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00415.html (8,942 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@mediacombb.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:39:45 -0600
Bryan-- I asked him how he felt about point sources or radiation in free space, but got no answer. Bill--W4BSG Believing in something does not make it so. Given that it is hard to realize in practice
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00416.html (10,813 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:41:16 -0800
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Bartender, I'll have what Mr Duffy is having, but just make it a single. Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00417.html (9,023 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:32:01 -0600
"Believing in something does not make it so" .... Really? What about an isotropic radiator, defined as a theoretical point source, as used in every antenna modeling program? What about the "imaginary
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00419.html (11,962 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:37:59 -0600
Oops ..... I should have attributed the RF Ground posting to Dr. James Duffy. KK6MC. -- Wes Attaway (N5WA) (318) 393-3289 - Shreveport, LA Computer/Cellphone Forensics EnCase Certified Examiner -- co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00420.html (11,229 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:54:12 -0500
Yes, it's a concept. It is not reality. Again a concept. I believe you have me (W9CR) confused with KK6MC. And you're entitled to your opinion. I'm also entitled to call BS on it. -- Bryan Fields 727
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00421.html (10,503 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:30:10 -0800
OK - so besides all the name calling, mud slinging, and flame throwing, what have we accomplished???? This got boring about a week ago!! 73 Tom W7WHY I think he made a perfectly valid argument about
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00422.html (9,999 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:20:23 -0500
I was flabbergasted at the response to Duffy's post, which seemed relatively non controversial to this relatively low level scientific brain of mine. Can't one specify a perfect ground (even though i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00423.html (12,268 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:15:48 -0800
"Specify?" I think you mean "assume." But few antennas depend upon a connection to earth for their operation (some RX antennas do). One can ASSUME a homogenous earth of known properties for the purpo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00424.html (13,106 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:54:42 -0800
Adding a bit to K9YCs discussion, a ground plane, or any ground in a piece of equipment may indeed be at 0 volts as far as DC power is concerned, but it is also an excellent carrier for other signals
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00425.html (13,784 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu