Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RF\s+Ground\s+is\s+not\s+a\s+Myth\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: "Don " <w7wll@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:15:00 -0800
Agree Tom, but it has been interesting to see all the views. Lightning here is less a hazard then the damn elk who chew on the coax. Ground here is where I put the bulbs. Don W7WLL OK - so besides al
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00426.html (11,564 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: "Don " <w7wll@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:24:00 -0800
Ground is only a reference point relative to a measurement, whatever type it is. Don W7WLL Adding a bit to K9YCs discussion, a ground plane, or any ground in a piece of equipment may indeed be at 0 v
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00427.html (15,125 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: David Gallatin via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 03:47:23 +0000 (UTC)
Dr. Duffy could be totally right. The problem with his post is when I matched that against all the study and research I've doneon the subject myself the fact is NOTHING he said in that post matched o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00428.html (13,560 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 10:39:49 -0700
Along those same lines ... When I was a young product engineer for a semiconductor company, I was responsible for Tuning Diodes and made a trip to one of the top manufacturers of mechanical UHF TV tu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00432.html (16,049 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 10:42:42 -0700
This discussion seems to me to be a lot more relevant to understanding RF than 90% of the other topics that typically show up here ... short attention spans notwithstanding. Dave AB7E This got boring
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00433.html (11,431 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Mike Reublin NF4L <nf4l@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:44:32 -0500
I had a math professor who tried explain the concept of a signed zero to me. He couldn't, but I'm sure it was my failure and not his. He also claimed to be able to add two feet to infinity. 73, Mike
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00434.html (10,008 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:55:36 -0800
I'll have one of whatever he's drinking. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00435.html (10,194 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:37:06 +0000
Does this help? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signed_zero Steve G3TXQ 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00436.html (10,523 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Mike Reublin NF4L <nf4l@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 19:37:47 -0500
No, but it does make my hair hurt..... Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00443.html (11,499 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 17:45:07 -0700
Steve, Thanks for posting this... Signed zero does sound rather silly as a concept but the wikipedia article explains how it has practical value. Now back to RF Ground... 73, Bob K0NR Mike NF4L Does
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00444.html (10,930 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:03:43 -0500
Can't one specify a perfect ground (even though impossible in the real world) when modeling antennas? Is that not a useful exercise as an educational tool? The only good reason for *assuming* homoge
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00445.html (10,332 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 01:40:51 -0500
Mike did you explain to him that that is asymptomatic of an asymptote ? Best regards - Brian Carling AF4K Crystals Co. 117 Sterling Pine St. Sanford, FL 32773 Tel: +USA 321-262-5471 _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00446.html (10,827 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Ground is not a Myth (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:23:57 -0600
Holy Cow!!! Welcome to Lilliput. Didn't a lot of us start out with the water analogy to understand simple electrical circuits. In my first formal electronics studies we used hypothetical components:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00448.html (14,836 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu