Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RF\s+Inquiry\s+HI\-Q\s+Filter\s+CF5KV\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RF Inquiry HI-Q Filter CF5KV? (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:07:52 -0500
What are the collective thoughts about the design efficacy of this device (author's sloppy spelling aside)? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Selling the RF Inquir
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00456.html (7,688 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Inquiry HI-Q Filter CF5KV? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:37:47 -0600
Hmmm, Aside from wondering about anybody who can't be bothered to read his ad before posting it, this product looks an awful lot like Radioworks' T4 Line Isolator, the most expensive of which is $43.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00457.html (8,601 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Inquiry HI-Q Filter CF5KV? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:18:49 -0500
to read his ad Radioworks' T4 Line $50. I just measured a Radioworks isolator and it isn't anyplace even remotely close to the common mode isolation impedance they publish. The Radioworks isolation
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00458.html (7,886 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Inquiry HI-Q Filter CF5KV? (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:02:42 -0500
So, would it be fair to say that there is no good reason to believe that this product will actually have any effective impact on rfi, swr, or anything else of interest to Hams? -- Thanks! & 73, doc k
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00459.html (8,579 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Inquiry HI-Q Filter CF5KV? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:23:45 -0800
I would imagine that inside that piece of PVC pipe is a row of fairly conventional toroidal cores with a piece of coax running through them. Lots of places sell them. Several design choices for the m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00460.html (12,287 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Inquiry HI-Q Filter CF5KV? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:33:30 -0600
Hmmm, Aside from wondering about anybody who can't be bothered to read his ad before posting it, this product looks an awful lot like Radioworks' T4 Line Isolator, the most expensive of which is $43.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00463.html (10,140 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Inquiry HI-Q Filter CF5KV? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:49:27 -0800
realist, This is where the ARRL could help. The have a very nice lab that all past and present members have helped to pay for. They could easily test stuff like this a publish the data in short produ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00464.html (9,166 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Inquiry HI-Q Filter CF5KV? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 13:48:12 -0800
I'd I think you're right, Mike. However, they are faced by the same limited time resources as are we all. They're also somewhat restricted by their policy of only testing things that they buy themsel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00465.html (13,681 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] RF Inquiry HI-Q Filter CF5KV? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:54:56 -0800
time I be 100-200 Yes, that is where forum's like this can come in. Why pay an engineer or test lab to do destructive testing when your customers will pay you full price for the priviledge of doing i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00467.html (10,264 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu