Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RG\-304\s+for\s+CMC\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RG\-304\s+for\s+CMC\s+\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:35:42 -0700; Does anybody know anything about RG-304 ? Its aprx .271 OD.... and has teflon + silver braids /center conductor. Im having a helluva time trying to find out what gauge the center conductor is. Does a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00369.html (7,856 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 18:46:59 +0200; Its much smaller then RG-8X, but a little larger then RG-142. http://www.caledonian-cables.co.uk/Coaxia_Cable/M17_RG/RG304.html 73 Peter, DJ7WW Does anybody know anything about RG-304 ? Its aprx .271; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00370.html (8,366 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:03:49 -0700; (.249) It appears the center conductor on 304 is 1.5mm = .059 inch = 14.5 gauge wire. The center conductor consist of silver plated steel ! Solid too, not stranded. Never heard of silver plated stee; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00371.html (9,999 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 13:07:22 -0400; Center conductor is silver plated copper strands with a steel core which I'd never seen before. 73 Roger (K8RI) 8X (.249) It appears the center conductor on 304 is 1.5mm = .059 inch = 14.5 gauge wire; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00372.html (11,097 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:11:16 +0200; RG-142 inner conductor is also plated steel as all that of SAT coax is. Sheet diameter of RG-304 is 7.1mm. 73 Peter (.249) It appears the center conductor on 304 is 1.5mm = .059 inch = 14.5 gauge wir; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00373.html (10,587 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:11:15 -0700; That would be fine above about 10 MHz, but steel coated with anything greatly increases conductor resistance below a few MHz as compared with solid copper. You can see this in Belden's published data; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00374.html (8,268 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 10:20:54 -0700; Center conductor is silver plated copper strands with a steel core which I'd never seen before. 73 Roger (K8RI) http://www.caledonian-cables.co.uk/Coaxia_Cable/M17_RG/RG304.html It clearly depicts th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00375.html (7,441 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:17:24 -0700; On 4/24/16 9:35 AM, Jim Thomson wrote: Does anybody know anything about RG-304 ? Its aprx .271 OD.... and has teflon + silver braids /center conductor. Im having a helluva time trying to find out wha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00377.html (10,164 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:23:14 -0700; Center conductor is silver plated copper strands with a steel core which I'd never seen before. 73 Roger (K8RI) http://www.caledonian-cables.co.uk/Coaxia_Cable/M17_RG/RG304.html It clearly depicts th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00378.html (8,369 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:20:54 -0700; (.249) It appears the center conductor on 304 is 1.5mm = .059 inch = 14.5 gauge wire. The center conductor consist of silver plated steel ! Solid too, not stranded. Never heard of silver plated steel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00379.html (8,761 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:27:44 -0700; Center conductor is silver plated copper strands with a steel core which I'd never seen before. I think it's silver plated copper clad steel (SCCS) which is basically silver-plated copperweld. The si; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00380.html (8,873 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 11:39:53 -0700; That would be fine above about 10 MHz, but steel coated with anything greatly increases conductor resistance below a few MHz as compared with solid copper. You can see this in Belden's published data; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00381.html (8,432 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 17:06:19 -0400; Hmmm... I'm not sure where I got the idea it was stranded with a steel core.?? It still should work fine through HF, but the bending radius might be limited compared to RG-400, which is what I use. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00382.html (9,056 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 17:14:14 -0400; What's the difference between using LMR-400, or BuryFlex with six 12" dia Loops equally spaced, compared to bundling the same size loops into a single bunch or for that matter, grouping any coax toge; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00383.html (9,545 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 17:08:33 -0700; Right. but other than that (and looking neater), what about the choke's characteristics? Would it narrow the range of high impedance? Lower, raise, or leave the maximum impedance unaffected? In gener; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00384.html (9,328 bytes)
16. [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 21:35:08 -0700; What's the difference between using LMR-400, or BuryFlex with six 12" dia Loops equally spaced, compared to bundling the same size loops into a single bunch or for that matter, grouping any coax toge; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00395.html (9,027 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 22:44:40 -0700; Right. Depending on choke config, it can narrow the range of the choke, Not if the core material is #31 or #43. to the point where it covers 80m with high 5-6 k RS... but not 40m. Lousy on 40m, like; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00396.html (10,025 bytes)
18. [TowerTalk] RG-304 for CMC ? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 06:50:56 -0700; Right. Not if the core material is #31 or #43. This is nonsense. This is also nonsense. Chokes wound for the HF bands using #31 and #43 material have VERY low circuit Q, typically on the order of 0.4; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00462.html (12,268 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]