- 1. [TowerTalk] RG-6 quality ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 01:09:43 -0400
- What can I expect as far as variation in cable quality at UHF if I buy RG-6 at Home Depot or Lowes or Circuit City? I need a 35-40' run of something with less loss than RG-58 by Saturday to play arou
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00087.html (7,369 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-6 quality ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:22:40 -0700
- An issue more important than loss is making good connections to it. The stuff they sell in these retail houses is designed for MATV and CATV, for use with very good crimp connectors. They have Al shi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00088.html (7,446 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-6 quality ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 02:49:41 -0400
- Check for local electrical suppliers. I purchased an Greenley (sp?) crimping tool and F-connectors that are *supposed to be water proof. I also have the tool and connectors from DX engineering. Both
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00091.html (8,835 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-6 quality ? (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:27:02 -0700
- I haven't used RG-6 much for ham applications, but have hundreds of feet installed for satellite TV here. There are several reputable brands, such as Belden, Commscope, etc., but a lot of junk also.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00097.html (8,841 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-6 quality ? (score: 1)
- Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:46:53 -0400
- There used to be a variety of RG-6 diameters just different enough to require their own connector. That seems to have thinned down to regular foil & braid and Quad shield. I buy 1000' reels of CommSc
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00124.html (11,580 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu