Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RG6\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+RG6\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@wildblue.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:52:51 -0400; There a couple of things to look for: RG6 for most cable and TV applications uses a copper clad steel center conductor. RG6 for satellite (Wildblue, Hughes, Direct TV) requires a solid copper center; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00152.html (7,517 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 19:53:48 -0500; I got a hold of some copper clad steel RG11 and man is that miserable to work with. 73, de Jim KG0KP _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ To; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00156.html (9,033 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Tim Heger" <n3xx@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:18:28 -0400; If you are trying to use RG6 or RG11 without the proper stripping & connector tools, or trying to make it work with connectors not made for it, it may be a problem too work with. But with the proper; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00161.html (10,550 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: Jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:26:15 -0400; TT: I'm wondering if anyone has worked with RG6 for power transmission, or might know the limitations. Radio Shack recently added a line of "waterproof" crimp connectors, and a crimping tool for use; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00325.html (7,636 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:52:39 -0400; I'm using it matched at 100W on a lot of antennas now, but I've heard it can take a kilowatt matched. I can't test that, I only run barefoot. It's lower loss than RG-8/X and about the same size... so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00328.html (7,761 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:53:34 -0500; Jim.... One place I found adapters was L-com.com. Bought them just a few weeks ago online: Item/Description Qty Price Subtotal Availability -- -- BA160 10 $2.77 $27.70 In Stock Coaxial Adapter, UHF M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00329.html (9,579 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:53:58 -0700; RG6 varies a lot, and virtually none of it that I see in the field is really RG6/U (per the military specification of yore). Most all of it is cable TV stuff, most of which is very good quality but s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00330.html (8,639 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:00:37 -0700; There are many different variations on RG6, just as there are many different variations on RG59, RG6, RG8X, and RG11.These variations affect power handling and loss. An RG6 designed for CATV/MATV use; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00331.html (8,499 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:06:16 +0200; RG6 is used as a phasing line (half wave balun) with MSquare antennas. So far I had no problem at 2KW+ with my 144MHz antennas 73 Peter TT: I'm wondering if anyone has worked with RG6 for power trans; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00332.html (8,792 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:40:09 -0400; Jeremy, Got any more specific description than "zapped" or did you not do an autopsy? Did it seem to be voltage breakdown or heat related? I guess it was SSB/CW duty cycle since you were at both end; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00333.html (8,038 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:40:42 -0400; Sorry... Carl! Looked at the email adress!!! _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lis; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00334.html (7,484 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:32:27 -0400; Ive zapped ComScope quad shield on 75/80M with 1500W by trying to run a sloper on both ends of the band. Changed it to a 2 wire version cut for 2 frequencies and it works fine. The light weight compa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00338.html (9,641 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:58:43 -0400; Didnt do an autopsy, I could see the zap in the dark. Insulation broke down with the VSWR developed voltage. It was around 4:1 at 3.8 MHz. Luckily it was only 2' away from the connector so I just cut; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00339.html (9,096 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] RG6 (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:33:52 -0700; Fed from a 75 ohm source, worst case voltage would be twice the matched voltage (full reflection), likewise worst case current is twice matched current. However, if you have reactive components at bo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00346.html (8,838 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]