Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Radial\s+losses\s+\-\s+was\s+copper\s+thefts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Radial\s+losses\s+\-\s+was\s+copper\s+thefts\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Radial losses - was copper thefts (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 09:19:30 +0200 (CEST); How much more loss is one likely to get from using galvanised wire for radials? My feeling is 'not much', and probably not measurable in an amateur context. But what do others think? 73 Peter G3RZP P; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00328.html (6,877 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Radial losses - was copper thefts (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 04:32:02 -0400; As far as normal ground resistance I'd really not expect to see much difference. OTOH I'd be concerned about diode action and noise from the barbs in some conditions. The barbs are just a short piece; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00329.html (8,291 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Radial losses - was copper thefts (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:58:07 -0500; Barbless wire is available for horse farms. It's about the same price and comes in one mile reels. 73, Keith NM5G As far as normal ground resistance I'd really not expect to see much difference. OTOH; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00339.html (9,656 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]