Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[FCG\]\s+HF\s+LOG\-PERIODIC\s+ANTENNAS\s+Comments\s+Please\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Jednacz" <tjednacz@ieee.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:05:39 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Hi Rich, I have a four element SteppIR and am very pleased. I replaced a well designed 10 element triband yagi - Bencher Skyhawk (which by the way is still for sale - $300 in excellent condition). Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00460.html (13,570 bytes)

2. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:50:44 -0500
Nice station! Your SteppIR must have the complicated matching network to work for all bands since element positioning is a compromise with the design. This network is lossy. By contrast, a Force 12
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00462.html (8,760 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:10:08 -0700
At 02:05 PM 6/22/2004 -0400, Tom Jednacz wrote: A log periodic antenna is a compromise in order to cover a wide frequency range while providing an acceptable SWR in the ham bands. Acceptable SWR over
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00463.html (14,648 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: Joe <WD0M@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:40:01 -0600
Sounds like Force 12 propaganda...check their web site. ;-) Then check the SteppIR web site. Interesting comparisons. My momma always told me not to step on someone to make myself look taller. My Ste
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00470.html (11,852 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck O'Neal" <cdoneal@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:20:33 -0400
Jim Lux makes some very good points with reference to LPDA's. I run two stacked LPDAs on 62 ft long booms, 18E each, independently rotatable, that cover 14 - 30 MHz. They are stacked at 55 and 110 fe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00472.html (17,894 bytes)

6. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:56:32 -0500
blah....and a great antenna: SteppIR 4 element with 2 passive elements for 6m. Another nice station! buy it....right? Touch&eacute;' Keith _______________________________________________ See: http:/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00473.html (9,444 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: Don Havlicek <n8de@thepoint.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:49:13 -0500
The 'original' design of the LPDA [Dr. Duhamel - Collins Radio] used TWO sections in an 'arrow' configuration .. that is .. the longer elements were 'stacked' considerably farther apart than the shor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00476.html (27,954 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "on4kj" <on4kj@skynet.be>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:33:23 +0200
Reight Keith. Jos blah....and a great antenna: SteppIR 4 element with 2 passive elements for 6m. Another nice station! buy it....right? Touch&eacute;' Keith __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00499.html (11,166 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 05:42:35 -0400
their log about the higher gain at each elements is a good Perhaps they will, but I doubt it. The log retains the advantage of wide bandwidth and no tuning time. Keep in mind commercial installation
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00501.html (10,964 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "Grillo's" <ah3c@frii.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 04:21:53 -0600
The LPDA I used on KH3 in 1990 had no maintenance for 30 years when I showed up. It was fixed to USA. Check results in 1990 ARRL DX contests and you can see how well it worked, still no further maint
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00505.html (12,335 bytes)

11. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "Daly, Greg TQO" <gdaly@tqs.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:39:33 -0700
According to the manual with my Steppir the matching circuit is a Jerry Sevick design 2:1 balun on a 2 1/4 inch ferrite core. It sounds reasonably simple and low loss to me. How much does the Force 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00532.html (8,808 bytes)

12. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [FCG] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:12:43 -0500
Read further and you will find lots of comments from many on this list. Congrats on your purchase. A friend of mine recently obtained the same antenna and is quite pleased with its performance. Howev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00533.html (10,179 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu