Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[SteppIR\]\s+4el\s+SteppIR\s+at\s+Dayton\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[SteppIR\]\s+4el\s+SteppIR\s+at\s+Dayton\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: [SteppIR] 4el SteppIR at Dayton? (score: 1): Author: rmoodyg@bellsouth.net (Richard M. Gillingham); Date: Mon May 19 20:28:57 2003; Aye, and it's LARGE, lad. FluidMotion Questions.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00245.html (8,344 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: [SteppIR] 4el SteppIR at Dayton? (score: 1): Author: k3bz@arrl.net (Jerry Keller); Date: Mon May 19 22:53:20 2003; Large... 32 foot boom...sure. BUT... it's only 75 lbs and less than 10sq.ft. That doesn't seem to be a lot of load in order to get performance that's better than six 4L monobanders on 20 through 6. A; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00247.html (9,942 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]