Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+80\s+meter\s+4\s+squares\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+80\s+meter\s+4\s+squares\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: 80 meter 4 squares (score: 1): Author: windev@inetmarket.com (Gerry Hull); Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:50:43 -0500; Hello All, The debate over vertical radial systems will still be raging long after we are all dead and buried.... A story to relate... A few years ago, a team of friends were helping Robby, VY2SS, pu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00301.html (8,809 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: 80 meter 4 squares (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:34:53 -0500; Hi Gerry, I know this is often an uphill battle, but what the heck. Here comes reality. Hang on! "Ended up with" as this is the ultimate he tested in valid tests when trying several things or..... "e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00303.html (9,271 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: 80 meter 4 squares (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 04:35:38 -0800; A wide swr like that is a sure indication of loss!! You could forget the radials. Just drive a piece of pipe in the ground, connect the ground shield to it, and have a great SWR. That is one reason; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00315.html (7,872 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Re: 80 meter 4 squares (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17:46:49 -1000; And, also experience a radiating efficiency, both xmit and rcv of about 4 to 5 dB more poor than a very simple 80 meter doublet!! I had exactly the above up out here: a Gladiator vertical with four; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00316.html (8,194 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]