Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Aluminum\s+Masts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Aluminum\s+Masts\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Aluminum Masts (score: 1): Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com); Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:04:48 EST; Hello All: Aluminum is a appropriate material to use for many purposes, including masts, towers, airplanes. The suitability for a given purpose is controlled by the DESIGN, not the material. I have j; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00286.html (7,884 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: Aluminum Masts (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:52:45 -0500; I'm delighted to see someone point out the real issue. The issue is the *design*. I have aluminum masts here that, if they were steel, you would never be able to work with them. They are as strong o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00293.html (8,090 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: Aluminum Masts (score: 1): Author: kr7x@attbi.com (kr7x@attbi.com); Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:34:20 +0000; Tom and Talkians: You are absolutely correct. As long as you keep the stress within the allowables, aluminum is fine and the strength to weight ratio is better than steel. Where the problems may occu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00297.html (8,100 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]