Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Bye\,\s+Scott\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Bye\,\s+Scott\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Bye, Scott (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 11:54:16 -0500 (EST); had let Hi, Scott -- Your first "joke" posting elicited LOTS of unnecessary traffic complaining about it, etc. Since I figure everyone makes a mistake once in a while, I let it pass. You have just po; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00184.html (7,760 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: Bye, Scott (score: 1): Author: km3g@cts.com (Lane C. Zeitler); Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 08:59:03 -0800; Steve K7LXC, THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!!!! Yes he may have made a "mistake" the first time but not the second. Excellent move Steve. Lane KM3G -- To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I am hit have in; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00185.html (8,795 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: Bye, Scott (score: 1): Author: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan); Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 09:08:44 -0800; I agree 100%. His first taste of vulgarity was like stepping in something that smelled bad. The second taste I appreciated even less. First time, shame on him. Second time, shame on us. Thank you, St; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00187.html (7,583 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Re: Bye, Scott (score: 1): Author: nick@amradiotrader.com (Nick Smith); Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 10:38:57 -0600; Dear Steve: You are to be commended for you action in this matter. Thanks and keep up the good work. Nick WA4GKM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@cont; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00208.html (8,698 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]