Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Elevated\s+Guy\s+Anchors\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Elevated Guy Anchors (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Levin" <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:05:01 -0800
At the risk of being annoying, this topic has been debated at length in the past. Please read the archive, conveniently provided by our own KA9FOX at http://www.qth.com/ka9fox/elev-guy.txt . Everythi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00054.html (6,823 bytes)

2. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Elevated Guy Anchors (score: 1)
Author: Jack Berry <jlberry@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 07:34:36 -0600
Okay, I looked over the digest Dan. I can't think of a reason to spend all that time, effort & money to get guy anchor points above ground. What drives that decision? At the risk of being annoying, t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00055.html (7,822 bytes)

3. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Elevated Guy Anchors (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:05:59 -0500
I'm not an expert in this, but one good reason is that it keeps the guys above head level. This reduces the chances of someone running or driving into a guy wire and getting hurt or damaging the guy.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00062.html (10,510 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Elevated Guy Anchors (score: 1)
Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:01:50 -0500
Although his information and the information they used on mine differ at several points. I mentioned guy anchors shifting/tilting which is usually taken as bad, but in reality (depending on the load)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00065.html (9,677 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu