Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+GAP\s+TITAN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+GAP\s+TITAN\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: GAP TITAN (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 08:58:29 -0600; The main problem with the GAP antennas is that on the LOWEST BAND they use INDUCTIVE loading at the feedpoint which is the least efficient method of loading a short antenna. This inductive loading is; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00232.html (7,588 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: GAP TITAN (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 01:37:12 EDT; We made the mistake of using one during a CQWW 160M Contest. We were on the Pacific Ocean and we could hear EVERYTHING! But we could only work about 1/3 of the stations we called. I'd say that was pr; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00255.html (7,205 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: GAP TITAN (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 09:51:15 -0400; Hi Tom, You're right on, the Gap always is a poor performer on it's lowest designated band and OK on the next bands up. The reason is simple. The mini-RG8X foam coax GAP uses internally for matching; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00273.html (9,024 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]