Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Ground\s+radial\s+fields\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Ground\s+radial\s+fields\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: ground radial fields (score: 1): Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com); Date: 29 Mar 1999 05:14:08 -0000; I actually constructed 1/8 of a system of 500 radials 4 wavelengths long on 20 meters. The 45 degree sector with the long radials was pointed toward Europe. It was worth an extra 3 dB when using a ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00517.html (9,416 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: Ground radial fields (score: 1): Author: rick@area.com (rick@area.com); Date: 31 Mar 1999 05:30:53 -0000; I'm not sure if this is clear on my web site, but I had 32 quarter wave radials spaced equally around the test vertical in addition to the 60 radials that were 4 wavelengths long. So my opinion is t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00558.html (9,143 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]