Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Guy\s+wire\s+interaction\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Guy wire interaction (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 22:47:49 -0400
Hi Doug, I'm responding to this as a general response, even though you sent me an e-mail. I think this is an area that needs looked at by others. I modeled my guylines on EZNEC, and included loads in
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00173.html (10,101 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Re: Guy wire interaction (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 09:29:52 -0700
Hi Tom, To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Snip... The load reactances will be evaluated at whatever frequency you run the model. A frequency rescale will not rescale the load network component values. H
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00190.html (8,889 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Re: Guy wire interaction (score: 1)
Author: Clive Penna" <clive@gm3poi.prestel.co.uk (Clive Penna)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 08:08:13 +0100
"However, besides rescaling the wire lengths, a frequency scale will also change the diameters. While this may have a small effect on the model behaviour, I'd reset the wire diameter after the rescal
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00218.html (7,660 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Re: Guy wire interaction (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 10:53:11 -0700
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Right you are Clive! I had just assumed that Tom would enter guy wire diameters in inches rather than as AWG numbers. So, what is the AWG number for 5/16" EHS guy wire
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00221.html (8,047 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu