Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+HF\s+beam\s+product\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+HF\s+beam\s+product\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: New HF beam product (score: 1): Author: jmellis@ihug.co.nz (Martin Ellis); Date: Sun, 18 May 1997 20:47:20 +1200; Good morning, The Preliminary Announcement of Bencher Skyhawk 3x10 has aroused some interest among readers. So how does it compare with standard models? We are fortunate to have an exhaustive analysi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00438.html (8,123 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: New HF beam product (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Sun, 18 May 1997 07:59:07 -0400 (EDT); A better comparison for the announced beam might be the idealized 3-element beam I have used for some comparisons, with a max gain in the region of 8 dBi (free space). Comparing 2 and 3 element beams; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-05/msg00441.html (8,454 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]