Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Static\,\s+Lightening\,\s+and\s+protection\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Static\,\s+Lightening\,\s+and\s+protection\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightening, and protection (score: 1): Author: Didier Juges <didier@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:18:24 -0600; I am glad that in the scientific arena theories are not validated by voting. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00432.html (9,285 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightening, and protection (score: 1): Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:24:32 -0600; I agree with the comment about "voting" on scientific theories. There was a time when people thought that the weather could be predicted, but they found out that only the probability of the weather w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00512.html (11,290 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]