Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Static\,\s+Lightning\,\s+and\s+protection\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection (score: 1)
Author: Didier Juges <didier@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:22:37 -0600
Good point. At higher altitude, the dielectric strength of air is less, so the voltage cannot build up as much before the strike starts, so the clouds cannot build as much energy as they can in Flori
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00433.html (8,151 bytes)

2. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:50:49 -0000
less, so statistically the change is relatively small. In a typical area of central Florida the median stroke current is about 25kA, where in central Colorado it is about 20kA. In the highest curren
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00436.html (9,763 bytes)

3. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection (score: 1)
Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:22:03 -0600
statistically the change is relatively small. In a typical area of central Florida the median stroke current is about 25kA, where in central Colorado it is about 20kA. In the highest current range (2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00438.html (12,220 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection (score: 1)
Author: Didier Juges <didier@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:40:02 -0600
statistically the change is relatively small. In a typical area of central Florida the median stroke current is about 25kA, where in central Colorado it is about 20kA. In the highest current range (2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00440.html (10,504 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:04:34 -0800
At 09:22 AM 3/22/2004 -0600, you wrote: Good point. At higher altitude, the dielectric strength of air is less, so the voltage cannot build up as much before the strike starts, so the clouds cannot b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00445.html (9,352 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection (score: 1)
Author: "on4kj" <on4kj@skynet.be>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 23:43:15 +0100
Just wonder what the Dutch PA PI & PE think about this. They often live below see level. Jos -____________________________________________________- so clouds Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00455.html (9,293 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection (score: 1)
Author: "Mark ." <n1lo@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:15:48 -0500
Hi All, When I was researching my tower, I ran into the same controversy as to which protection scheme worked best. I decided to adopt more than one. A prerequisite, of course, is to have a good ligh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00468.html (8,759 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection (score: 1)
Author: Phil - KB9CRY <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:03:16 -0600
Well, here's my two cents, again. I'm no expert but an avid learner and researcher. Here's an article by Polyphaser titled, "What is Lightning?" http://www.polyphaser.com/ppc_PEN1020.asp (And that's
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00469.html (9,931 bytes)

9. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:20:27 -0500
properly grounded towers and a significant reduction of strikes was very strong. To the extent that I worried about lightning damage until I got the big tower up and then I never had any more strikes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00524.html (8,518 bytes)

10. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightning, and protection (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:23:49 -0500
At 09:20 AM 3/24/04, Bill Tippett wrote: Another footnote to this. It seems that only a bare tower is insufficient to dissipate the charge buildup. Since moving back to NC from CO, I put the same 150
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00525.html (8,463 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu