Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+TH7\s+Traps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+TH7\s+Traps\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps (score: 1): Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:46:18 -0400; Folks - let's remember we are talking about a tribander covering a frequency range of X to 2X Since this equates to two different ideal boom lengths for 2 out of the three bands (not to mention the o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00354.html (15,077 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps (score: 1): Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:39:26 -0700; Not a mechanical nor mathematical engineer but having had both TH7 and C31XR my experience is that the C31 is much better, especially on 10 and 15 meters and much easier to tune to WARC bands. No tra; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00357.html (17,229 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 22
Page: [1] [2]