- 1. [TowerTalk] Re: Tower Under-Engineering (score: 1)
- Author: rudder1@ibm.net (Malcolm Clark)
- Date: Sun, 05 Apr 1998 17:09:38 +0000
- [snip] Yep, it's Glades County. Monroe County is strictly a mailing address these days. Come now, an imbedded tower may be buckled by high winds but it isn't going to to be torn loose from an 8000 lb
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00112.html (8,905 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Re: Tower Under-Engineering (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC)
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1998 11:14:49 EDT
- would QSL. It only confused me a little. Bottom line? 100 MPH is a helluva dangerous wind velocity of anything. Under-building your tower system would be a gross error. You KNOW that? Jeez, you don't
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00124.html (9,639 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu