Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+coax\s+splices\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+coax\s+splices\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: coax splices (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 09:01:35 +0100; I'd agree with that. I had to scrap an all-coax feed system for the 8-yagi 432MHz EME array because of water leaks in the damp British climate. There was a total of 13 N connectors... but which one h; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00839.html (10,455 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: coax splices (score: 1): Author: n3hrt@eagle1.eaglenet.com (Martin Gary); Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 00:12:37 -0400; Gerald, I don't know what kind of N connectors you are getting, but the ones that I use have a rubber seal on the back of the connector and inside where they mate together. I NEVER put one out in the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00834.html (7,891 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: coax splices (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com (TexasRF@aol.com); Date: Sat, 30 Aug 1997 21:12:23 -0400 (EDT); N3HRT mentions using N connectors for splicing cables and I certainly agree with him that these connectors are far superior to the PL259s for that application, especially at VHF. I have use N connect; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00830.html (8,023 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]