Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+extending\s+tower\s+masts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+extending\s+tower\s+masts\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: extending tower masts (score: 1): Author: k2kv@netusa.net (Jeff Singer); Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 14:45:32 +0100; Frank - I wonder where u got those specs? After my last message, I checked my original notes. US Tower told me 500# but I never could get a 70 mph rating. 200# is way too light! Any 4130 mast of 20 f; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00517.html (7,454 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Re: extending tower masts (score: 1): Author: ftbrady@cosmoslink.net (Frank T. Brady); Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 11:59:13 -0700; I just called US Tower again (209)733-2438 and the lady verified the figures. I passed on your comments and she said she would have the owner (Bruce) call me this afternoon within two hours. Again, t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00519.html (8,508 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: extending tower masts (score: 1): Author: ftbrady@cosmoslink.net (Frank T. Brady); Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 15:29:42 -0700; Bruce at US Towers called and verified the load and weight limits I had previously posted. His company does not give any information on what to expect when varying from their published specifications; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00530.html (7,760 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Re: extending tower masts (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 11:13:33 -0700 (PDT); Actually, lots of them just fail when the wind comes up . . . Stan w7ni@teleport.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative r; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00670.html (7,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]