Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+gain\s+specifications\s+\(was\s+CobWebb\s+antennas\)\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: gain specifications (was CobWebb antennas) (score: 1)
Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:41:32 +0200
Very well said Mike, unfortunately it is a true work of art in confusing customers and claiming gain that is simply not there .. while at the same time keeping a door open to always withdraw from fal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00515.html (11,338 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: gain specifications (was CobWebb antennas) (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:27:15 -0700
Fortunately, we have very good computer modeling tools these days, Con, so it is much harder to fool the consumer if he is doing his homework (at least when it comes to antennas that lend themselves
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00518.html (11,503 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: gain specifications (was CobWebb antennas) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:21:14 -0700
It would, of course, help if the manfacturers of antennas would provide modeling information. Preferably as a "ready to run" NEC deck, but just dimensions would be good too. This is sort of what ARRL
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00522.html (11,500 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu