Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+steppir\s+radio\s+interface\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+steppir\s+radio\s+interface\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1): Author: "N6KJ" <kelly@thejohnsons.ws>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:42:26 -0800 (PST); Yes, but the SteppIR retunes every 25KHz. Suppose I am tuning around 14.025. Every time I jump over the "retune point" the controller starts running the stepper motors. There appears to be no (or ver; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00392.html (8,604 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 01:15:45 +0000; N6KJ added: Yes, but the SteppIR retunes every 25KHz. Suppose I am tuning around 14.025. Every time I jump over the "retune point" the controller starts running the stepper motors. And you then hear; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00398.html (8,784 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1): Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:32:18 -0500; And you then hear something & call it, transmitting into the antenna whilst it's tuning. D'oh! Kelly later mentions leaving the antenna where it was after a band change, as one might only be having a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00400.html (8,711 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:33:48 -0800; commonly Seems like the autotuning interface feature needs a "hold" switch added for those situations where autotuning is a nuisance rather than a feature :) 73 de Mike, W4EF............. __________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00402.html (8,602 bytes)
5. Re:[TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 03:21:00 +0000; KD4E suggested: Why not just stack a Cushcraft D4 or similar 10-14-20-40M dipole above or below the Steppir beam for band scanning? That way there is no problem with listening as the Steppir remains; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00415.html (8,001 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1): Author: edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:11:48 -0500; VR2BrettGraham wrote: KD4E suggested: Why not just stack a Cushcraft D4 or similar 10-14-20-40M dipole above or below the Steppir beam for band scanning? That way there is no problem with listening a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00416.html (8,713 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: steppir radio interface (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:25:44 +0000; KD4E replied: I don't understand. The SteppIR requires tuning, the D4 does not. That makes the D4 (or something like it) the perfect adjunct to the SteppIR. Another option might be a vertical to list; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00423.html (9,054 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]