Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rebar\s+or\s+no\s+rebar\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rebar or no rebar (score: 1)
Author: Mike Ricketts <mike.nd9g@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 18:41:07 -0500
I've recently acquired an older (mid 90s) Universal Tower, very similar in specs to their current HD-21-60. Looking at the plans, the foundation (5x5x6) calls for only the 3 base legs, and no rebar i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00124.html (7,828 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar or no rebar (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 16:49:13 -0700
Looking at the plans, the foundation (5x5x6) calls for only the 3 base legs, and no rebar is specified. http://universaltowers.com/pdf/HD_models/05-model%23-hd-21-60.pdf That 6 foot length of 2 inch
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00125.html (8,627 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar or no rebar (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 17:00:31 -0700
Make the inspector happy. It doesn't cost anything and if you do another job, he'll remember you fondly. Wes N7WS Looking at the plans, the foundation (5x5x6) calls for only the 3 base legs, and no r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00126.html (7,996 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar or no rebar (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 23:06:36 -0400
The steel legs go pretty deep into the concrete. I put a minimal rebar cage around the perimeter of the 30" base that I installed. On the smaller towers I do not recall doing anything. My new section
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00127.html (8,296 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar or no rebar (score: 1)
Author: Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 05:54:28 -0400
In 1972, I put up a used Heights 64' tower. All their specs at the time required was 4'x4'x4' of concrete, no rebar. Actually I put it up at two different locations. It is amazing to me how the base
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00128.html (7,864 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar or No Rebar (score: 1)
Author: Dennis W0JX via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 11:50:27 +0000 (UTC)
I have had Universal towers of varying heights since 1977. I am now in my 5th location using these tower sections. Three tower installations used a 26 inch base and two used 30 inch bases. In each in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00129.html (8,905 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar or no rebar (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 08:17:38 -0500
As our society has become so very much more litigious and jury awards have risen toward enormous, the potential cost per failure has risen precipitously. Tower base specs above and beyond any reasona
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00131.html (10,521 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar or no rebar (score: 1)
Author: Greg Best <gbconsulting54@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 08:24:46 -0500
A few other things to keep in mind. The tower industry has revised its standards from EIA 222 Rev F to Rev G. The tower failures in the broadcast industry and the wireless industry (and the associate
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-05/msg00132.html (11,893 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu