Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Recent\s+Cushcraft\s+discussion\.\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Recent Cushcraft discussion. (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:14:53 -0500
They certainly didn't give ME that kind of treatment with MY R7000. Not only did Cushcraft Technical Support make it abundantly clear they had absolutely no interest in helping me diagnose why my R70
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00053.html (7,887 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Recent Cushcraft discussion. (score: 1)
Author: k1ir@designet.com (Jim Idelson)
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:44:35 -0500
This CushCraft nonsense is not new . . . http://lists.contesting.com/_towertalk/199907/0257.html -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00057.html (7,140 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Recent Cushcraft discussion. (score: 1)
Author: wb6yaw@dreamsoft.com (Jim)
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:36:40 -0800
No it's not. A lot of you will remember how mad I was at Cushcraft for screwing the early X9 buyers when they decided to drop the 2 element 40 meter add-on. To add insult to injury, they (Dr. Steve)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00070.html (8,284 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Recent Cushcraft discussion. (score: 1)
Author: wb6yaw@dreamsoft.com (Jim)
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:40:24 -0800
No it's not. A lot of you will remember how mad I was at Cushcraft for screwing the early X9 buyers when they decided to drop the 2 element 40 meter add-on. To add insult to injury, they (Dr. Steve)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00071.html (8,286 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Recent Cushcraft discussion. (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet)
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:50:51 -0500
As a professional in my field (securities, money management, pension consulting) I can tell you that making statements and representations verbally OR in writing and NOT delivering on them, or making
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00072.html (13,701 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Recent Cushcraft discussion. (score: 1)
Author: wd4ngb@qsl.net (Bruce)
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 19:08:35 +0000
I was busy during the recent discussion on the Cushcraft antennas, and wanted to pass on my good experience with Cushcraft. I have a X7, that was one of the earlier release versions. I had still not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00436.html (10,174 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Recent Cushcraft discussion. (score: 1)
Author: w0hh@msn.com (Tom Champlin)
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 13:30:51 -0600
To All, My experience was the same as Bruce. I was getting ready to put up an X9 early version, and I called CC about an upgrade on log-cell parts that I had heard about. I talked to Art, K1ART. He w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00437.html (8,864 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Recent Cushcraft discussion. (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet)
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:03:24 -0500
HI Bruce, I'm glad that you had a good experience. He personally (and his attitude) was the source of MANY of my Cushcraft problems. I agree that how you approach the problem is often tied to the res
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00438.html (10,507 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Recent Cushcraft discussion. (score: 1)
Author: hankarn@pacbell.net (Dan)
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 14:54:08 -0800
Well, I have to add my comments. I had a R-7000 that was turning out to be a great dummy load with a lot of problems. I talked to ED after several futile attempts to talk and email. Got hold of Ed an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00440.html (9,095 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Recent Cushcraft discussion. (score: 1)
Author: tduffy@sygnet.com (Tim Duffy)
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:08:00 -0600
If CushCraft were to discontinue their Amateur antenna line and the support for it, it would make getting parts for existing CushCraft antennas impossible. I don't think that would be the best situat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00441.html (8,528 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu