- 1. [TowerTalk] Registered trademarks (score: 1)
- Author: RHealy@mdsroc.com (Healy, Rus)
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 11:01:16 -0500
- Actually, this is not necessary, nor is it desirable. In QST, for which I was a staff technical editor for seven years, we stopped doing that when our attorneys determined that there is no reason to
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00674.html (7,707 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Registered trademarks (score: 1)
- Author: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (ROBERT WANDERER)
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 09:27:19 -0800
- I respectfully disagree, but to each his own. I know from personal experience that some companies get hot under the collar if you leave off that (r). I won't mention their name, but I wrote an articl
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00676.html (8,867 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Registered trademarks (score: 1)
- Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (Stu Greene)
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 11:35:24 -0700
- -- The symbol ® universally means "registered trademark" or "registered service mark", and irrespective of whether owners of intellectual property get hot under the collar, a casual user is not r
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00681.html (8,194 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu