Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Remote\s+Ham\s+Radio\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Remote\s+Ham\s+Radio\s*$/: 59 ]

Total 59 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:02:36 -0400; The main point to me us you are operating someone else s station requiring that you sign your call/station call/license 73 Roger (K8RI) Al AB2ZY --Original Message-- From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00096.html (17,446 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: N7KA@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 05:19:37 +0000 (UTC); DXCC Please read ARRL DXCC Rule Section1 Paragraph 9 that addresses remote operations as it applies to DXCC. Remote operation does not define how control is accomplished. VHF link, telephone land lin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00099.html (8,883 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: n4zkf <towertalk@n4zkf.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 06:39:55 -0400; http://www.hudsonvalleytowers.com/ 73 Dave n4zkf e-mail: n4zkf@n4zkf.com web: http://www.n4zkf.com AR-Cluster node: 145.05 Mhz. or telnet://dxc.n4zkf.com:23 CC-Cluster node: 145.07 Mhz. or telnet://c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00100.html (11,709 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: n4zkf <n4zkf@n4zkf.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 06:45:43 -0400; http://www.hudsonvalleytowers.com/ They are not taking any new customers it says anyway. But I agree. What happened to "Amateur" radio? Not for pecuniary gain. 73 Dave n4zkf e-mail: n4zkf@n4zkf.com w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00101.html (11,421 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 08:41:19 -0400; Irrelevant. We are talking about using another person's station for pay. 73 Roger (K8RI) WAS There is no specific comment about "remote" operations. Rule 3 says all contacts must be made from locati; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00102.html (9,500 bytes)
26. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Crownhaven <crownhaven@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 08:15:10 -0500; Shouldn't you put Kenwood, Icom, Hy-Gain, etc., on your hit list too? This is becoming absurd. Did you make the chip in your PC? Steve, N4JQQ They are not taking any new customers it says anyway. But; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00103.html (12,339 bytes)
27. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Mickey Baker <fishflorida@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 09:17:58 -0400; Where did anyone every get the idea that there shouldn't be profit in ham radio? I assure you that the retailers and manufacturers of ham radio equipment are hoping for "pecuniary gain." You send you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00104.html (14,942 bytes)
28. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:14:24 -0400; We are not talking about profit in ham radio, we are talking about profit from using your station We are talking about hams, or a group of hams making money from their licensed station, not from sell; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00105.html (12,540 bytes)
29. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Richard Thorne <rthorne@rthorne.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 10:38:07 -0500; Using the 'airwaves' for profit is illegal, not the equipment. Rich - N5ZC On 8/3/2013 10:14 AM, K8RI wrote: On 8/3/2013 9:17 AM, Mickey Baker wrote: Where did anyone every get the idea that there sh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00106.html (13,149 bytes)
30. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "J.P." <jp@ezoom.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 08:38:14 -0700; Seems to me that if it was illegal, the ARRL wouldn't have published a review or rather would have said so. But it's not so innovators behind the project just laugh when you guys get unhinged about s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00107.html (13,489 bytes)
31. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Djordan (personal)" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 08:39:03 -0700; Wasn't this topic beat to death less than a year ago... You can regulate what ifs! There is hardly any difference between a club station supported by members and this approach...the club members are; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00108.html (14,477 bytes)
32. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Djordan (personal)" <wa3gin@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 08:41:58 -0700; Really, since when is the ARRL a standard bearer for best practices, haha. They'll go anywhere they can make a buck publishing... A topical story now and then is good for business ;-) Sent from my iP; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00109.html (14,532 bytes)
33. [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 08:49:47 -0700; We are not talking about profit in ham radio, we are talking about profit from using your station We are talking about hams, or a group of hams making money from their licensed station, not from sell; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00110.html (11,747 bytes)
34. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 09:03:26 -0700; I guess all those DXpedition shacks need to shut down, then. I would regard that as a great pity. DXing has to have people who aren't stateside or who live at least part time in places few to no oper; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00111.html (11,993 bytes)
35. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Steve Dyer <w1srd@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 09:34:43 -0700 (PDT); Can we please kill these super off-topic threads and hold the opinions for other more appropriate forums. I subscribe to this list to learn about and share knowledge about *TOWERS*. 73, Steve W1SRD; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00112.html (15,687 bytes)
36. [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Spencer <k5gak@powerc.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:06:53 -0600; Now that its too hot to work outside I'll go see whats on the radio. Spencer W1GAK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing li; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00114.html (7,981 bytes)
37. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 17:36:16 -0700; Or getting reimbursed for expenses from a commercial entity for a service provided by using the airwaves. 73 Jim W7RY Nope this is the USA monetary gain Trumps ethics:-) Seriously I think that rule a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00116.html (12,813 bytes)
38. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "davidrobbins" <davidrobbins@ieee.org>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 15:29:23 +0000; "We are not talking about profit in ham radio, we are talking about profit from using your station We are talking about hams, or a group of hams making money from their licensed station, not from sel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00117.html (10,351 bytes)
39. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 16:03:34 -0400; to make contacts on HF. Im real tempted to install RX beverages for 160M on my daughters 5 acres..just so I can hear better. Jim VE7RF Agreed Accessing your station via the internet is still using y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00119.html (9,272 bytes)
40. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 16:18:50 -0400 (EDT); Can we take this argument outside to the parking lot? Let's debate something about towers and antennas...like whether plastic owls do the job of keeping bird poop off the tower and antennas. Bill K4X; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00120.html (8,148 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]