Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Remote\s+Switches\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Remote\s+Switches\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Remote Switches (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 22:48:27 -0500; Until recently, I was using a remote switch on my tower (it fell a couple of weeks ago). In looking at a design to replace it, I want to incorporate a remote switch. Several manufacturers seem to mak; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00845.html (8,267 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Remote Switches (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 00:11:28 -0400; What appears to be missing in the picture you painted is the usual choking device to decouple the unbalanced feedline from what otherwise is a balanced antenna. One could construct a balanced feedlin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00847.html (10,168 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Remote Switches (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider (N3RR)); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 00:26:09 -0400; Ford, You are "missing" BALUNs at each antenna. Think about it. The beads you installed acted like/as a BALUN and isolated your 40M dipole from the switch and everything else. That's the reason why o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00848.html (9,458 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Remote Switches (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 06:17:00 -0400; VK3ZL says he has your QSL on 160, and has replied. Why is that a flaw? Shields are supposed to be permanently grounded, so why can't they be grounded at the switch? It's the way you are using antenn; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00850.html (8,078 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] REMOTE SWITCHES (score: 1): Author: "TOMMY HALIBURTON" <ROCKETJ10@MSN.COM>; Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:01:47 -0700; To All, I have visited this road once before now. Again, I am trying to select a remote switch for my four (at the moment) antennas. I am looking at the DX Engineering DXE-RR8-HD, the MFJ-RCS-10, and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00156.html (6,544 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] REMOTE SWITCHES (score: 1): Author: Hector Garcia XE2K <j_hector_garcia@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:43:17 -0800 (PST); Tommy: i will go fo the DX eng, i got the mfj and dx eng have more options, to get clear idea, read the instruction manual , is online.. sealed enclosure, better relays than MFJ, you can select 2 ant; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00159.html (7,901 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] REMOTE SWITCHES (score: 1): Author: "K4PI" <k4pi@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:22:20 -0000; HI Tommy, A friend of mine, N4SS , bought the DX Eng and we took it apart and I am impressed with the quality they put into it plus you have the opitons of wiring each input to be either grounded or; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00161.html (6,967 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] REMOTE SWITCHES (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:26:10 -0500; I am currently using two of the TopTen 6-way switches in my remote SO2R switchbox. They have been flawless in operation, even though they do not have many bells and whistles. For example, the antenna; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00163.html (10,120 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] REMOTE SWITCHES (score: 1): Author: "TOMMY HALIBURTON" <ROCKETJ10@MSN.COM>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:41:20 -0700; To All, Thanks for your rapid responses. Of the eleven responses I received the skewing is as follows: ICE = 1 DXE = 5 ACOM 2000S = 1 TOP TEN DEVICES = 2 MFJ RCS8 = 2 Again thanks for your valued inp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00181.html (7,158 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Switches (score: 1): Author: "Gary Stone" <n5phtgs@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:09:30 -0500; Gary, N5PHT ** Gary Stone, N5PHT ** ** 347 CR 1250 ** ** Savoy, Texas 75479 ** UNITED STATES OF AMERICA _______________________________________________ ______________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00364.html (8,296 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Switches (score: 1): Author: "Jim Chaggaris" <jimc@pwrone.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:17:31 -0500; I have been using the RatPak 6 for the last 2 years without problems. The DXE switch is more robust (costs more) and has better isolation. I settled on the RatPak as all my outside connections use N; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00365.html (9,402 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]