Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Remote\s+control\s+of\s+elevation\/lowering\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Remote control of elevation/lowering (score: 1)
Author: "Fred Serota" <fserota@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:01:36 -0400
Has anyone wired the control box of a US Towers MD750 to control the lowering of the tower from the house(shack). Although the company sells a remote control, they do not seem to want to sell it, imp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00155.html (7,705 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote control of elevation/lowering (score: 1)
Author: Mickey Baker <fishflorida@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:20:02 -0400
I've ruminated about this issue. I'd love to be able to retrofit my tower (when I get it installed) as well. Here's a few issues I've identified: 1. The largest potential liability for the manufactur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00159.html (9,960 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote control of elevation/lowering (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:25:28 -0400
I saw on some guy's QRZ page his lowering method. He had an outside camera monitoring his crankup tower. The camera output went through an A/B switch to his pc monitor, so that he could monitor the t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00160.html (10,882 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote control of elevation/lowering (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:58:58 -0700
Two issues arise: 1) I haven't seen the wiring diagram, but wiring switches in parallel might result in the possibility of a short circuit. There are ways to do multiple reversing switches that don't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00165.html (8,512 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote control of elevation/lowering (score: 1)
Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:46:03 -0400
i have a shack camera to watch my tower, but i keep the control out back by a door so I can actually hear the motor drive... i really want to know that it sounds right as it goes up or down The conce
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00167.html (9,380 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote control of elevation/lowering (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:20:39 -0700
I have an HDX-5106 with the factory control box, which I have never used. I always operate it locally. I also have the "secret" schematics for the tower and remote box. What I don't like about the US
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00169.html (9,323 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote control of elevation/lowering (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:34:04 -0700
If you have any sort of automation, you want to make sure that there's no possible way that someone could have their arm sticking into it when it starts to move. That typically means either it's a sm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00189.html (8,620 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu