Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Reply\s+to\s+Ox\-gard\s+use\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Reply to Ox-gard use (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert L. Shohet)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:00:36 -0800
Tom, Ox-gard, Noaalox and others are NOT great conductors. In fact if you put on too much you will guaranty poor contact between the elements whether you use a wire brush or not. The BEST way to use
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00233.html (7,483 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Reply to Ox-gard use (score: 1)
Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:33:01 -0800 (PST)
Mmmmmmm........I guess the folks that make and sell this stuff just tell the world that products such as Penatrox "provide high conductivity" joints just to sell more of this poorly conducing paste t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00234.html (7,926 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Reply to Ox-gard use (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 09:44:25 -0500
None of these compounds, including those with metal, are "good" conductors. Two or two thousand pieces of metal, non-welded or soldered joints only make a conductive joint when considerable pressure
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-12/msg00261.html (7,844 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu