Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+25\/Crankup\s+loading\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+25\/Crankup\s+loading\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25/Crankup loading (score: 1): Author: "Pat Barthelow" <aa6eg@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:13:37 -0800; From: "Hank Lonberg" kr7x@comcast.net Said: Malcolm: If you notice the sections get larger as you go downward from the top. The tower sections get stronger and can handle more moment as you go downwa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01206.html (10,173 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25/Crankup loading (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:47:04 -0800; The downward. towards each You bet it would change the dynamics (and statics, too!)... One interesting aspect is that the bending loads are carried not by the cables, but by the overlapped segments.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01208.html (10,695 bytes)
3. RE: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25/Crankup loading (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:14:49 -0500; Pat, The cable goes up to a PULLEY, then down again to another. The pulley is taking half the load, so a percentage the load *IS* carried by the corners of the tower. The lift cable is *NOT* carrying; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01209.html (10,401 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25/Crankup loading (score: 1): Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:24:55 -0800; is corners Then where does the other part of the "lift" come from when raising the elevated portion of the tower sections? k7puc _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscom; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01212.html (9,290 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]