Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+25\s+Max\s+Overturning\s+Moment\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+25\s+Max\s+Overturning\s+Moment\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 Max Overturning Moment? (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:27:54 -0700; Hi folks, I want to put some Rohn 25 up on my flat roof (50 ft if it will work). Will have to go to 4 point guying because 3 point would mean that at least one of the guy anchors would be way too clo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00609.html (10,037 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 Max Overturning Moment? (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:06:54 -0700; The wind standards include a wind profile formula, i.e. the wind velocity at ground level is zero and increases with height. I doubt that Rohn or any other tower maker wouldn't take advantage of the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00610.html (12,561 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 Max Overturning Moment? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:11:40 -0400; I'm a bit confused here. You are looking at guying the tower, but working on a self supporting base figures. The over turning moment isn't normally a consideration for a guyed tower, or is it? I've n; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00611.html (12,226 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 Max Overturning Moment? (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:04:51 -0700; Well, duuhhh. You think you're confused. As you point out, for a guyed tower I don't need this number. Yes, I understand your other points. Oh well, it was an interesting exercise. I would still like; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00616.html (12,966 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 Max Overturning Moment? (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:10:53 -0400 (EDT); Jim, the tower section specs are conservative to allow some safety factor in the data., Actual failure moment is more and unpublished as it logically would vary a little from one batch of steel to th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00619.html (12,086 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]