Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+25\s+guy\s+radius\s+oddness\.\.\s+80\%\s+vs\s+50\%\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: zippy@sunsetd.com (Ryan Niemi - AV)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 20:06:47 -0800 (PST)
Hi everyone, I've been browsing the TowerTalk reflector archives for a while, to gather as much info as I can before installing a small Rohn 25 at a hilltop site. I just received my Rohn Consumer Pro
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00370.html (9,901 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: K7NV@contesting.com (Kurt Andress)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 01:39:45 -0800
Ryan, Makes the head swim, eh? Welcome to the world of cookbook designs, and the notion that everything put in print is the gospel! It can be, when we understand it, and have all the information. The
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00371.html (12,471 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 07:11:49 EST
50% anchor radius or 80% anchor radius - they're just different scenarios. You could have 30% or 120% too or anything inbetween. I don't know the engineering reason for the difference but as you poin
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00372.html (10,595 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: davidg@primenet.com (David Gilbert)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 06:07:19 -0700
Hi, Steve. For the same guy tension, a 50% radius will put a greater downward force on the tower (equivalent to a heavier antenna if you neglect wind loading) and it will provide less lateral force a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00373.html (9,291 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 08:34:57 EST
I agree and I thought my comments reflected the recommendation to go with 80% rather than 50%. I was responding to his proposed installation specifically which is pretty small - not to *all* installa
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00374.html (9,070 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 06:30:10 -0600
Ryan, The 80% guy radius specification is designed to allow maximum loading on a tower at the rated maximum height with a reasonable guy radius. (For Rohn 25, 200 ft is the maximum rated height). One
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00375.html (12,389 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: Hank.Lonberg@Harrisgrp.com (Lonberg, Hank)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 07:46:12 -0800
List readers: Actually you can put the guys where you want within reason. You just have to account for the increased force developed in the guy as you move the anchor point closer to the tower base.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00378.html (11,724 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com (TexasRF@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 11:25:01 EST
Another perspective on this question: If you examine the guying specs for a Rohn 48ft Foldover tower model FK2548 ypu will find a recommended guy distance of only 18 feet, or 37.5 percent of the towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00379.html (8,868 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: Hank.Lonberg@Harrisgrp.com (Lonberg, Hank)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:04:39 -0800
Gerald: Actually I don't think any of it is attributed to the fact it is 4-way guyed. A design condition would be with the wind load in line with one of the guys. In this case one guy is taking all t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00380.html (10,920 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: billwall@bellsouth.net (Bill Wall)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 17:51:06 -0500
Hi all, I agree with Hank. My first tower was Rohn-25G at 110'. The guys were about 45' from the base. 6'X8" screw in the ground anchors were used. 5/16 Ga. Power type guy cable was used with 12" tur
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00383.html (14,216 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 guy radius oddness.. 80% vs 50%? (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:56:30 -0600
Actually, there is a 15% reduction in the worst case guy load using 4 way guying vs. 3 way. The worst case load with 3 way guying occurs when the wind is blowing parallel to one of the tower faces, 3
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00385.html (10,564 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu