Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+and\s+Stacks\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rohn and Stacks (score: 1)
Author: wu4g@pipeline.com (Ron Bolton)
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 20:41:10 -0400
Unless I'm missing something here, I'm confused. I see the ads for stacking controller boxes, rotating tower bearings, rotating rings and such for mounting multiple beams on a single tower. The rings
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00151.html (8,730 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Rohn and Stacks (score: 1)
Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos)
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 03:46:21
Ron, I'm putting up towers conservatively (lotsa concrete, far guying) and basically ignoring Rohns specs. I think most are ignoring Rohn's spec - they are conservative. Towers do come down around he
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00156.html (10,567 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Rohn and Stacks (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 11:30:27 EDT
Do you mean that it exhibits less load when it's not at the top of the tower? The Rohn spec is for TOTAL tower loading but 90% of installations are headload (at the top). One of the things you need t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00164.html (8,275 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Rohn and Stacks (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan or Patricia Griffiths)
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 10:51:04 -0700
Hi Ron, You have the picture almost right. The missing part is that you need to realize that the Rohn specs you read in the catalog are for the SPECIFIC configuration of guying that is shown in the d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00174.html (12,680 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu