Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+foundation\s+information\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+foundation\s+information\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rohn foundation information (score: 1): Author: Alfred Watson <w4abw@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:28:26 -0500 (EST); In looking at the newest Rohn Catalog NO. 3 I do not see any detailed foundation drawings, IE hole size and a good drawing of a rebar structure for several tower sizes. I am mainly looking for a 55G; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00149.html (6,703 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn foundation information (score: 1): Author: TexasRF@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:05:47 -0500 (EST); Al, the info is on pages 167 through 169 At that height self supporting 55G will handle about 1.5 sq ft at 80 mph wind speed. You might want to review the Universal Tower as there are models that wil; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00150.html (7,551 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn foundation information (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:29:42 -0500; That's scary! Why not buy a tower designed to be self supporting? John KK9A To: towertalk@contesting.com Subject: [TowerTalk] Rohn foundation information From: Alfred Watson <w4abw@aol.com> Date: Wed; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00151.html (7,939 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn foundation information (score: 1): Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:46:04 -0600; Those close to Central Illinois may want to check WA9GCK's business http://hillradio.net/ for Rohn specs and prices. Glen, WA9GCK has been selling discount prices to Amateurs for many years. Glen has; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00152.html (8,753 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn foundation information (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:48:05 -0600; Considering 55G is only rated for 6.5 sq.ft at 50 feet self-supporting (70 MPH), 1.5 sq.ft (80 MPH) and not rated for anything at 90 MPH, not sure I see the point, either. Lots of good self-supportin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00154.html (9,107 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn foundation information (score: 1): Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:59:40 -0600; Rohn 55 I used AN Wireless, 90 feet ... like a battleship. Overdid the foundation with 21 yards of concrete, Check out the website 73 ed Ko0KL On 2/19/2014 11:28 AM, Alfred Watson wrote: In looking a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-02/msg00156.html (8,469 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]