Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rohn\s+wasn\'t\s+perfect\-\-\s+can\s+we\s+end\s+this\s+please\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rohn wasn't perfect-- can we end this please? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:08:10 -0500
Guys!!!!~ A few years ago, I bought some new 45G and the bloody stuff wouldn't even nest! One leg was over a half inch out of alignment...and not bent. It was welded that way. I had to have it remanu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00292.html (8,199 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn wasn't perfect-- can we end this please? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark - AA6DX" <aa6dx@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:42:40 -0800
Well, they (Rohn) went bust .. `nuff said? Mark .. AA6DX (What happens when the bean counters take over the company -- happened to mine!) -- Original Message -- From: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00295.html (8,568 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Rohn wasn't perfect-- can we end this please? (score: 1)
Author: <kk9a@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:41:29 -0000
I agree that since this thread started several months ago it is enough (or enuf, as many spell it) on the subject. I disagree that this does not belong on towertalk, however the name calling certainl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00307.html (9,031 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn wasn't perfect-- can we end this please? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:08:05 -0600
John, Please refrain from trying to turn speculation into fact. You obviously side with KQ2M. You and I do not know the facts! To pretend that you do, only adds 'wood to the fire'. On one hand you sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00309.html (9,329 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu