Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Romex\s+for\s+rotor\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Romex\s+for\s+rotor\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Romex for rotor (score: 1): Author: jcjacobsen@q.com; Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:34:16 -0500 (EST); The current question on the table is Romex for Rotors... in conduit.. Jim Lux, said in part: <snip> But there's no rule about Type NM (Romex) in conduit... <snip> I think if you read more closely you; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00020.html (7,157 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Romex for rotor (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 20:19:41 -0800; good point. I don't usually pull romex, but individual strands _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contest; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00023.html (7,200 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Romex for rotor (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:36:50 -0500; The difference in construction between NMB and UFB is profound. The NMB I have seen has a jacket around individual conductors, each of which is covered by what seems to be paper insulation. The UFB i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00032.html (8,573 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Romex for rotor (score: 1): Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 11:51:33 -0800; Thanks to everyone for the very useful inputs on rotor cable! Vy 73, Steve N6SJ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-03/msg00070.html (7,118 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]