Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rotator\s+capacity\s+clarification\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rotator\s+capacity\s+clarification\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rotator capacity clarification (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:00:21 EDT; Howdy, TowerTalkians -- There was a recent rotator discussion where a poster determined the loading that included a mast. The relative formula (weight times turning radius) gives Effective Moment (Hy; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00120.html (7,945 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator capacity clarification (score: 1): Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:33:48 -0600; Not according to Yaesu. I called them and verified this. The mast weight is included in the Yaesu K-Factor calculation. It is in the user manual for the G-800DXA/G-1000DXA/G-2800DXA series (page 5).; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00123.html (9,071 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator capacity clarification (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:56:20 -0400; You're both right. Yaesu wants you to multiply the weight of antennas and mast by the turning radius of the array and add that to the total K-factor. All that amounts to is a pseudo-scientific way of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00128.html (10,654 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]