Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rotator\s+vs\s+Rotor\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rotator\s+vs\s+Rotor\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 22:58:32 -0600; I am *so* glad to see this pointed out...thank you. That which turns is the rotor. That which causes the rotor to rotate is the rotator. But ham jargon is what it is. 73, Ward N0AX Just a thought....; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00069.html (8,340 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: "Don " <w7wll@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:05:06 -0800; Does this mean my old prop pitch motor should be called a rotator? Don W7WLL I am *so* glad to see this pointed out...thank you. That which turns is the rotor. That which causes the rotor to rotate i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00070.html (9,035 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 22:18:58 -0700; Does it matter? Would anyone not understand what you meant if you used either term? Has anyone ever not understood what was meant when discussing that-which-turns-the-mast no matter which term was us; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00071.html (10,069 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 07:38:41 -0600; M2 calls their Orion 2800PX device that turns a mast an antenna is mounted on a "positioner". :-) 73, Marsh, KA5M I am *so* glad to see this pointed out...thank you. That which turns is the rotor. Th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00074.html (9,672 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 05:39:56 -0400; Dave, Since the MS spell check now seems to be so important in how we organize our posts, please put in "obamacare" (with a lower case o) and see how bill Gates apparently has a sense of humor. Does; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00075.html (11,291 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 22:26:49 -0800; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: This is where the confusion comes from. In the above, "the thing which turns" could be taken either as the thing which goes round and round or it could b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00085.html (8,473 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 22:27:45 -0800; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Yes. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@cont; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00086.html (8,169 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 22:33:25 -0800; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Does it matter? Only if you care about English. I suppose you could call it an azimuth change-maker, but why not use the correct term in the first place?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00087.html (8,418 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: "Ed Williams" <sunset392@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 11:51:07 -0500; Hi All, Lets look at the Hygain rotating system. The device that is attached inside the tower turns itself 360 degrees, but it also turns whatever is attached the same amount. Thus it is correct to s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00095.html (8,950 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: "Don " <w7wll@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 11:13:32 -0800; My comment was tongue-in-cheek re the old prop pitch (still have the two selsyns too), but it is refreshing to see there is some passion amongst those on Towertalk for infinitely small detail. 55 yea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00098.html (8,760 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: GALE STEWARD via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 19:47:47 +0000 (UTC); Before my retirement, I worked in the Antenna Division of a large defense company that designed and built electronic systems for various branches of our military. We had both indoor and outdoor anten; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00100.html (8,663 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: Jim Forsyth <jim@af6o.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:02:15 -0800; I don't think you would use a positioner to change polarity, did you perhaps mean polarization (polarisation)? 73 Jim, AF6O On 1/4/2015 11:47 AM, GALE STEWARD via TowerTalk wrote: Before my retiremen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00101.html (9,474 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: Phil Snyder <n9lah@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:29:19 -0600; Now don't be too hasty. I did have a ham friend who had a small TV type rotor on the boom of his 3 element CC 6 meter beam so he could go vertical for FM or horizontal for SSB. I never did ask how th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00102.html (10,090 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: "Jim Hargrave" <w5ifp@gvtc.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:08:18 -0600; Wikipedia says: == "An antenna "rotator" is a device which is used to change the orientation of a directional antenna" "The "rotor" is a moving component of an electromagnetic system............." ==; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00104.html (10,763 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: "Jim Hargrave" <w5ifp@gvtc.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:19:35 -0600; I'll ditto this one. I have a TV rotator mounted horizontal in the middle of a 14 element 2 meter beam. I use it vertical for FM and horizontal for SSB. Mine must be a "rotating rotor" since it is mo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00105.html (12,375 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@mediacombb.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:35:53 -0600; From the amount of traffic, it's the most important issue of this year. It tops "True North", "Owls", and "Wenches" by a Mile. (Nautical) Bill--W4BSG Wikipedia says: == "An antenna "rotator" is a dev; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00106.html (12,438 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu; Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 20:59:45 -0800; Herb wrote... My son is law is from Beijing. His name is Yiding. MS word always changes his name to 'Yiddish'. Yiddish, he ain't! 73, George T Daughters, K6GT CU in the California QSO Party (CQP) Oct; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00119.html (8,825 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 12:11:27 -0800; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Infinitely small detail is whore the Devil lives, along with his good buddy Murphy. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ __; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00128.html (8,477 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:46:52 -0600; Can anyone imagine what problems of the world we could solve if we put as much energy into something that actually matters? 73 Kelly ve4xt Sent from my iPhone ________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00130.html (13,002 bytes)
20. [TowerTalk] Rotator vs Rotor (score: 1): Author: Ed Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 08:14:48 -0600; This sounds like circular reasoning to me .... ed K0KL _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00134.html (8,105 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]