Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rotor\s+load\s+bearing\s+weight\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Rotor\s+load\s+bearing\s+weight\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rotor load bearing weight (score: 1): Author: Chuck Gooden <Chuck.Gooden@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 23:30:36 -0500; Should the rotor in a tower, bear the weight of the antennas and mast? Or should the weight be on a bearing plate, and allow the rotor to be easily removed? What are the pros and cons of either appro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00394.html (8,102 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor load bearing weight (score: 1): Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:02:10 -0500; I think it is the universal answer, "It depends." In the case of a Kurt Andress converted prop pitch motor (a small one) he told me to let all the weight (over 250 lbs) rest on the rotor/rotator befo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00400.html (11,419 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor load bearing weight (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:14:05 -0700; Patrick, Solid, well thought out info. I love your disclaimer clause ! I am installing an Orion 2800 in my tower soon and this thread is very timely for me. Great information from you guys...........; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00403.html (12,392 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor load bearing weight (score: 1): Author: "Riki, K7NJ" <k7nj@awinets.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:07:58 -0600; Many years ago I installed a Ham-M rotator with a bearing above it and mechanical linkage to eliminate the weight on the rotator. This worked fine for a while. But, eventually, the top casting came l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00414.html (7,927 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]