Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+STACKED\s+40\s+METER\s+BEAMS\s+MATCH\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: Bob Gibson <w5rg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 08:05:31 -0800 (PST)
Hi All...I'm having a hell of a time trying to match a pair of 40 meter M2 4 ele beams..both antennas have 1.5 swr or less at 7.150..high or low..switching to both it goes up to 2.1 swr..I'm using a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00324.html (7,365 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:11:00 +0000
I'm not using any core, just bring the two of them to a box that lets me pick each one separately or just parallels them directly... bring that back to the shack and go through an mt-3000 to shift th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00325.html (8,844 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:15:08 -0500
Sounds about right. If the impedance at the shack end of the coax is 50 ohms for each, then in parallel, that's 25 ohms = 2:1. You can compensate in many different ways, or course, but the easiest is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00326.html (8,456 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:38:38 +0100
I donīt agree. The stack match is a more complicated and expensive way to do the matching. The easiest, less expensivest and imho best methode is series matching. http://www.seed-solutions.com/gregor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00332.html (8,443 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:48:30 +0000
The simplest version is a single 1/4 wave section that is added in when 3 or more yagis are paralleled... been using that here for years, add one jumper to an rcs8-v relay box and use 1n4001 diodes t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00334.html (9,811 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:58:28 -0800
Hi All...I'm having a hell of a time trying to match a pair of 40 meter M2 4 ele beams..both antennas have 1.5 swr or less at 7.150..high or low..switching to both it goes up to 2.1 swr..I'm using a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00342.html (11,715 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:35:32 EST
After hundreds of recent tests, the BOP mode is a dud for the most part. Even when listening to these daytime 40m nets, BIP is louder than BOP ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00345.html (7,997 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "David J. Sourdis - HK1A" <hk1kxa@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:56:07 -0500
Not as elegant nor as good like the ones exposed before but this is a poor man's, or emergency, stack match. Needed: Two antenna selector switches with two antenna ports One antenna switch with three
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00346.html (11,413 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:18:08 -0500
What ever happened to the good old (and simple) 2:1 unun which can be set up to give BIP, TO, or BO. with 4x SPST (QST, Feb 1994, p43) or 3x SPDT relays? In a contest I like to leave the lower on the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00349.html (14,083 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:29:03 -0500
I installed a StackmatchII+ a week ago on my 40m beams at 160' and 75' and I tested it out thoroughly during the Sweepstakes contest this weekend. In nearly all cases, BIP was better than BOP so I ra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00350.html (8,929 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: Larry K4AB <larry.k4ab@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:11:07 -0600
I use a Stackmatch to feed dissimilar antennas in order to spray RF in two directions. For example, during this past Sweepstakes, I fed a tribander at 60' pointed NW along with a different type of tr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00351.html (10,910 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <w5pr@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:43:51 -0600
Sometimes it helps to use BOP when the station you want to work is off the back and there is a strong signal in the front of the stack. Not worth the effort though imho. Chuck W5PR __________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00354.html (9,876 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:22:02 -0800
What do you find BOP useful for - DX or only domestic contacts? My results with BOP have been quite different. On all bands from 10-40 I incorporated BIP/BOP/TOP/BOT and found the BOP quite useful. P
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00356.html (8,489 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:54:51 -0800
I use a Stackmatch to feed dissimilar antennas in order to spray RF in two directions. For example, during this past Sweepstakes, I fed a tribander at 60' pointed NW along with a different type of tr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00358.html (10,789 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:26:28 EST
and I tested it out thoroughly during the Sweepstakes contest this weekend. In nearly all cases, BIP was better than BOP so I rarely used BOP. QSL that. If you've ever seen Bob Heil's presentation on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00382.html (8,494 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 02:30:12 -0800
and I tested it out thoroughly during the Sweepstakes contest this weekend. In nearly all cases, BIP was better than BOP so I rarely used BOP. QSL that. If you've ever seen Bob Heil's presentation on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00392.html (11,951 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:33:39 -0800
I believe you are correct about HFTA, Jim. From the HFTA manual: "The internal Yagi model in HFTA is a simple mathematical model. It does not compute interactions between individual Yagis in a stack-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00395.html (10,329 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:37:26 -0500
Agreed if both antennas are always aimed together, but if they can be pointed in different directions, you still need top-bottom-both switching. 73, -Steve K8LX ______________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00396.html (8,460 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:50:06 -0500
Dean has made it clear that he uses a simple isotropic source of the specified gain. Realize that the use of an isotropic source (e.g. no F/S in the vertical plane) also effects the final pattern by
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00398.html (12,000 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu