Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Self\-supported\s+tower\s+designs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Self\-supported\s+tower\s+designs\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <ea1ddo@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:38:57 +0000; Hi all, I am thinking to build a self-supported tower for my HK1H´s station. The tower could be around 25 meters high. Four sides Thinking in something like this; http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_umpsa6tUB2; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00199.html (7,215 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:11:48 -0400; How about this one? It's triangular, but a real brute! http://www.rogerhalstead.com/ham_files/skyhook.htm 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00200.html (8,742 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:12:27 -0400; The OP is looking for designs to construct the tower, while your link shows an install, impressive as it is, using commercial tower parts. Although if time is money, constructing a tower from scratch; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00210.html (9,423 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:58:48 -0700; You can get the tower design calculations for commercially made towers from their respective manufacturers. They want you to use these to get a building permit. However, the ones I have seen are deta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00211.html (11,668 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:52:32 -0400; That tower is completely home brew. All parts were fabricated by John WD8RXP. There were 3 semi truck loads of structural steel along with a small fortune involved in building that tower. <:-)) He ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00213.html (12,240 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: Doug Dietz <dcdietz@chartermi.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:55:01 -0400; _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00214.html (12,254 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:23:04 -0400; I missed the two lines above when I read this before. Reading them I respectfully make the following comments and no disrespect is intended. 25 meters is a tad over 81 feet (81'3" to be specific). Th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00217.html (10,274 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:26:39 -0700; A used boom lift might be a good alternative to building a tower. I've been tracking the used market and they go for $10k to $15k, used in good condition for 50-60 footers. (About the installed cost; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00218.html (10,281 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:09:02 -0400; Straying somewhat afield from the original topic... G0EVY has a full size 2 element 80m beam (think about that for a minute). I forget what he said it weighs, but somewhere north of 3000#. He bought; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00219.html (11,909 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:33:42 -0400; I think he's fed it a bit as IIRC it's now 2L on 160, 3 or 4 on 75 (reversable) and 5 or so on 40. I'd have to go out to the shop and check the log to be sure. He's on 7.160-7.175 give or take around; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00220.html (13,515 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Self-supported tower designs (score: 1): Author: "km5vi" <km5vi@flukey.cc>; Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:44:07 -0500; Thanks Joe. Sorry Maximo, I completely missed your location and situation. KM5VI --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jos; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00225.html (13,290 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]