Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Short\s+Tower\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Short\s+Tower\s+Antenna\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: barryb@i1.net (Barry Baker); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 06:17:41 -0600; Hello to the group. My call is KC0LCL. Given a choice of running a Hex-Beam at 40' which is its reccommended height or Something like the KT36XA from M2 technologies at the same height. 40' is pretty; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00570.html (8,775 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 07:50:46 -0800; I think you would be happier with the performance of the KT 73, Jim, K4OJ Hex-Beam M2 ________________________________________________________________________ Where do you get ICE bandpass filters &; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00572.html (10,251 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 09:48:41 -0500; The first fundamental thing you should do is to look at your terrain vs the potential height of your antenna, using a program like YTAD (free with the ARRL Antenna Book. your 40' may be the equivalen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00574.html (9,902 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (Dave Hachadorian); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 08:04:19 +0000; I have been running a KT-34XA, predecessor to the 36XA, for the last 20 years on a 48' tower. It works extremely well. I think the XA will make you very happy. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ K6LL@ju; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00575.html (8,651 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:19:29 -0800; I agree totally with Pete. The Hexbeam is a compromise 2 el yagi with bent wire elements. It could not possibly compete with a conventional yagi with full size straight elements. The KT 34 class beam; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00576.html (11,808 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 11:18:39 -0500; I agree with Pete ... the KT-34XA was a maintenance headache for many people. The unbalanced 36 foot boom is also a problem for many under size towers and rotors. However, even the short boom versio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00577.html (10,161 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:21:24 -0600; Actually, 40 ft is an EXCELLENT height for daytime MUF's. It will cover ALL of the higher angles supported by the ionosphere and is often (usually) better than 60 to 80 ft high antennas on 10 and 15M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00578.html (10,659 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:55:26 EST; M2 Sure. The LXC Imperative states to "GO with what you got". If all you've got is 40 - then go with it. It won't be as good as some but with a decent antenna, you'll have a ball with it and work lot; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00599.html (8,695 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: John_L_Pantaloni@icpmech.navy.mil (John_L_Pantaloni@icpmech.navy.mil); Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:32:09 -0500; __________________ Hi Barry, I went through the same decision a few years ago. I own a Hexbeam and I can tell you that it will hang with any of the short boom multibanders. I've come to this conclusi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00603.html (9,683 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: richard@karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist); Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:49:06 -0800; That's interesting about what Tom told you. I remember him giving a talk at Pacificon a few years ago where he said 2 dB makes a huge difference in a contest. The other thing to consider is that if y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00604.html (9,519 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:51:39 -0600; OK, I'll go along with your first 4 dB as potential places for loss but you didn't substantiate your jump to "5 to 10 dB". The lack on an amplifier is the only justification I can think of, assuming; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00606.html (10,418 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: jreisert@jlc.net (Joe Reisert); Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:41:57 -0500; Hi Rick, Let's not forget that the receive signal improves too with increased antenna gain usually because the pattern is narrower and therefore, noise pickup is decreaed. I had a drastic improvement; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00608.html (11,608 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]