Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Shunt\s+Feeding\s+a\s+Vertical\s+an\s+easier\s+wat\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Shunt\s+Feeding\s+a\s+Vertical\s+an\s+easier\s+wat\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feeding a Vertical an easier wat (score: 1): Author: Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:09:42 -0400 (GMT-04:00); Gang, This is my annual request that there is a simpler way to feed a tower. Tom N4KG wrote an excellent article on his reverse feed system in the April 1994 QST. With Tom's system using elevated rad; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00179.html (8,079 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feeding a Vertical an easier wat (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:47:41 -0700; If you make the combination of the length of the radial(s) plus the length of the tower above the radial(s) equal to an electrical half wavelength, everything on the tower below the radial(s) is chok; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00189.html (9,718 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feeding a Vertical an easier wat (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:55:26 -0400; The N4KG system looks good when evaluated for SWR and ease of installation. It, however, has serious performance issues. 1) W8JI and others are right - there can be significant ground losses dependin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00191.html (9,052 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feeding a Vertical an easier wat (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:58:59 -0400; If you make the combination of the length of the radial(s) plus the length of the tower above the radial(s) equal to an electrical half wavelength, everything on the tower below the radial(s) is chok; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00192.html (11,006 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feeding a Vertical an easier wat (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 13:07:58 -0700; I actually found a post that N4KG himself made a couple of years after his QST article where he mentioned that the performance of his inverted system seemed to be worse than what he once had with a f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00193.html (10,899 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feeding a Vertical an easier wat (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 20:37:38 -0400; I actually found a post that N4KG himself made a couple of years after his QST article where he mentioned that the performance of his inverted system seemed to be worse than what he once had with a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00196.html (12,820 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]