Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Shunt\s+fed\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Shunt\s+fed\s+towers\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Shunt fed towers (score: 1): Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn); Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 21:35:22 -0700; You bet it is. My friend K5AQ in Texas has used a crankup tower with separate gamma matches for each band tuned with vac variables. He is a serious competetor on 160 with around 200c. 73, Dan, N5AR T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00000.html (8,839 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Shunt fed towers (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 03:12:18 +0000; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> After reading this post I was wondering is it possible to shut feed the same tower for 80 and 160? I already have the stuff to shunt feed my 70' tower on 160 and I wil; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00008.html (8,400 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Shunt fed towers (score: 1): Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn); Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 18:59:52 -0700; After reading the comment by my old friend W5AH, I pulled my May 1975 Ham Radio to read the article. It is very complete, 6 pages with 4 sets of curves. If someone will post it on their web page, I w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00679.html (6,932 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Shunt fed towers (score: 1): Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn); Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 07:41:04 -0700; Kevin Adam has volunteered to scan and put the May 1975 article on the Fort Wayne Radio Club web site. I am mailing a copy to him today. This is not the same as the CQ article presently on the site.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00684.html (7,260 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Shunt Fed Towers (score: 1): Author: csudds@probe.net (Chuck Sudds); Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 15:03:38 -0500; I am interested in getting something on the air for 160 and/or 80m for the upcoming winter season and the prospect of shunt feeding my new 90 ft tower sounds like a pretty good idea. Can any of you T; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00731.html (7,377 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Shunt Fed Towers (score: 1): Author: k4sqr@juno.com (Jim MILLER); Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 16:14:53 -0400; Chuck; Load the 90' tower as a Conical Monopole for superior efficiency Vs shunt-fed. Use an Electrical 1/4 w of coax at 1.830 and it will give 80 & 160 easily. Add 60 radials and have fun. 73, Jim M; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00733.html (6,946 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Shunt Fed Towers (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 08:50:56 -0400; Hi Jim and all, The efficiency of a conical monopole and a shunt or series fed tower are identical except for a very slight reduction in resistive losses in the antenna conductors. Those losses are,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00753.html (7,781 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]