Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Single\s+boom\s+solution\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Single boom solution (score: 1)
Author: Jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:50:02 -0400
TT: This is a planning/brainstorming question, with a time-horizon of 12-14 months. Sometime next Summer, if things go as anticipated. This is an antenna question, not tower. The question is a single
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00716.html (7,423 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Single boom solution (score: 1)
Author: "R. Kevin Stover" <rkstover@mchsi.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:59:53 -0500
I've been thinking of case one myself. Instead of the CC 40 I've been thinking about the Optibeam 4030. 2 elements both bands on one boom. - -- R. Kevin Stover, AC&Oslash;H --BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-- Ve
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00717.html (9,394 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Single boom solution (score: 1)
Author: Hector Garcia XE2K <j_hector_garcia@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Jim: You have a very interesting question, here the idea is how much wind load your tower will handle options are from my point of view 1 plus can be Ob15-7 all 1 boom 1 Optibeam OB13-6 10 12 15 17 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00726.html (10,379 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Single boom solution (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:47:00 -0700
Probably don't have to retract all the way to reduce the interaction enough. Just enough to get the resonance "away" from where it was. _______________________________________________ _______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00737.html (7,614 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu