- 21. Re: [TowerTalk] Site Grounding (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Neverdosky <mikenever@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:55:18 -0400
- This is somewhat location dependent. Here in Florida, with the poor conducting soil (even wet) the depth of the rod is very important. A local commercial installer told me that it is not uncommon to
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00492.html (8,898 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TowerTalk] Site Grounding (score: 1)
- Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:04:33 -0400
- TT: I agree with Phil and Tony regarding the use of exothermic welding over clamping for underground ground (?) connections. They are maintenance-free as compared to mechanical clamps that ought to b
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00500.html (10,781 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TowerTalk] Site Grounding (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris BONDE" <ve7hcb@rac.ca>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:38:52 -0700
- Last year I had the electric service replaced and a few amps extra. The grounding method of to the water pipe was not allowed. A copper plate about 10 by 16 inches was place about 20in into the groun
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00502.html (9,824 bytes)
- 24. Re: [TowerTalk] Site Grounding (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Miller" <ac5tm@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:47:41 -0000
- Here in the City of New Orleans a connections to both a 8' ground rod and water pipe (within 5' of where it enters the building) are required. Tom AC5TM -- Original Message -- From: "Chris BONDE" <ve
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00510.html (11,260 bytes)
- 25. Re: [TowerTalk] Site Grounding (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris BONDE" <ve7hcb@rac.ca>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:44:28 -0700
- Part of this thread was about using copper pipe and brazing it at the joints. Question: there is a copper pipe that can be bent, similar to conduit. I think that it is just a softer alloy of copper.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00512.html (12,802 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu